The last thing Jamie Watson wants is a rugby scholarship to Sherringford, a Connecticut prep school just an hour away from his estranged father. But that’s not the only complication: Sherringford is also home to Charlotte Holmes, the famous detective’s great-great-great-granddaughter, who has inherited not only Sherlock’s genius but also his volatile temperament. From everything Jamie has heard about Charlotte, it seems safer to admire her from afar.
From the moment they meet, there’s a tense energy between them, and they seem more destined to be rivals than anything else. But when a Sherringford student dies under suspicious circumstances, ripped straight from the most terrifying of the Sherlock Holmes stories, Jamie can no longer afford to keep his distance. Jamie and Charlotte are being framed for murder, and only Charlotte can clear their names. But danger is mounting and nowhere is safe—and the only people they can trust are each other.
Rating: 2/5 Stars
“I had been careless with my life, I knew I
was, but if I died tonight, I was going to be furious.”
I went into
A Study in Charlotte looking to find an interesting mystery story as well as
witty and entertaining characters, and… it was fulfilled, in some ways, but it
also left a lot to be desired.
I’ve read a
few Sherlock Holmes books for school, and although I can’t say I’m a fan of
them (for some reason I find both Sherlock and Watson too annoying in their own
ways) I do love most of the adaptations, from the movies with Robert Downey Jr
and Jude Law, to BBC’s Sherlock and the American, Elemental (although I’ve
heard not many people are fans of the later?). So I thought, maybe A Study in
Charlotte would be like the adaptations and I’d end up loving it. Sadly, that
didn’t happen and I was left a little disappointed. The mystery was predictable,
and oddly put together. I felt like the author was trying to balance the main
plot, which was the characters being framed for murder, with the building
romance between Watson and Holmes but without fulling committing to one or the
other. Simply put, it was a mess.
I’ll admit
I had been curious to see how Holmes would fare as a girl, and I had expected
it would be like in Elemental with Watson, with both of them becoming friends
and partners, helping each other grow not only in knowledge but in human
relationships and without romance. That was not the case here, and I wasn’t the
biggest fan of it. Mostly because Watson shows an unnatural and frankly, a
little creepy obsession with Holmes, but also because I feel like the writer
made Holmes a girl so there could be romance between her and Watson and,
honestly I don’t understand why he couldn’t have stayed a boy. Or both being
girls! Actually the whole book would have been much better if the story was
narrated by Holmes’ roommate, Lena as her Watson. Lena was, unlike Jamie, a
much more interesting character in the few scenes that we see her in, and she
would actually add something to Holmes’ characterization.
As for the
characters, I found Holmes too similar to the original one, with a few cute
moments here and there. I wish we could have seen more of that, but the story
was narrated by Watson and most of what we got from him were wonderings on
whether he wanted to kiss Holmes or if he was attracted to her. Sigh.
Now, this
is something that bothered me and that I feel the need to point out but I
haven’t seen it in many reviews so, perhaps it was just my problem? Anyways, I
still suggest you try the story for yourselves and see, but what disturbed me
was to see how rape was handled here.
We know
that both Holmes and Watson are being framed for the murder of a guy named
Dobson, a boy in campus that was obsessed with Holmes and who Watson beat when
he said he had slept with her. Now, the reason why most people would believe
Holmes could have killed him is because Dobson raped her when she was too high
on oxycodone. Because she had been sent abroad for her addiction, Holmes knew
that if she confessed to the rape, the authorities would also know that it
happened while she was under the use of drugs and she would be expelled,
leaving her family to feel sorry for herself, so she kept quiet.
Now, rape
is a very serious subject and the way it was presented here could have been very
powerful. A brilliant mind with a dependence to narcotics is raped and refuses
to ask for help or even take matters into her own hands and punish him,
vigilante-way, because she has already been a disappointment to her family for
so long, she didn’t want to add another disgrace. Do you see how wrong this all
is? And yet, when we learn about it, do we see Holmes coming to terms with the
school, students and her family knowing about it? Do we see the stigma she has
to carry because people think it’s her fault and that she “deserves” it?
No, we
don’t. All we see is how upset Watson
is that Dobson raped her, and how, by behaving like any normal human being
would and show sympathy, he is somehow labeled as a great guy, because he
didn’t blame Holmes for being raped. If that’s all it takes to be labeled a
hero, our standards are pretty fucking low.
What
bothers me is, it would make sense for Holmes in all her rationality to try not
to process an emotional response. Combine that horrible trauma with a brain
prone to logic and reason, and you could see why she would try to look at it
“objectively” and not react emotionally. But we never see this conflict, Holmes
is never given a chance by the author to ponder on her assault, instead all we
see is how she being raped affects Watson. Because when a woman is brutally
attacked, it’s all about how the guy with the creepy crush feels about it?
I didn’t
like how it was handled, not one bit. I kept hoping it would come up, but in
the end the sexual assault was used as a way to put conflict between Holmes and
Watson and why they can’t be together.
In the end,
A Study in Charlotte showed a lot of promise, but the romance took over the
mystery part, and the way rape was handled was very insulting. I recommend it
for fans of the genre, but I’m not sure of how fans of this pair will react to
it.
No comments:
Post a Comment