Her opponents are men-thieves and assassins and warriors from across the empire, each sponsored by a member of the king's council. If she beats her opponents in a series of eliminations, she'll serve the kingdom for three years and then be granted her freedom. Celaena finds her training sessions with the captain of the guard, Westfall, challenging and exhilirating. But she's bored stiff by court life. Things get a little more interesting when the prince starts to show interest in her... but it's the gruff Captain Westfall who seems to understand her best.
Then one of the other contestants turns up dead... quickly followed by another. Can Celaena figure out who the killer is before she becomes a victim? As the young assassin investigates, her search leads her to discover a greater destiny than she could possibly have imagined.
I
was sure I would love this.
The first
book I read by Sarah J. Mass was A Court of Thorns and Roses and it was one of
my favourite 2015 books, next to The Wrath and the Dawn. I adored the writing
style, the world building, and the characters too. I had always heard about
Throne of Glass as a separate series, I’m a big Tumblr user so every now and
then amazing fanart, posts and discussions about the series would pop up on my
dashboard, sparking my curiosity more and more. I wanted to be a part of that
fandom, I wanted to fangirl at the characters and relationships, to overthink
every detail and write overly complicated meta about the littlest thing, as I
always do.
The first
few pages I liked, sure there were a few logical errors here and there (Like
the guards not taking a prisoner blindfolded, or Celaena’s almost pristine
physical condition after spending a year being beaten and starved to death) but
I wasn’t going to be picky, I loved ACOTAR and I was sure I would love Throne
of Glass, I mean, it’s about a female assassin and mysterious murderers, what’s
not to love??
And yet,
the more I read into the novel the more things started to bug me. The writing
style was all “Tell and not show”, we were constantly told what we should think
about a character, an action, anything. I started to feel like a small child,
as if I were too dumb to pick on such obvious stuff on my own. The problem with
this kind of writing is that it not only bores the readers with endless
descriptions of things they can see for themselves, but it also doesn’t give a
lot of credit to the writer itself. Those are stuff the reader should figure
out, if you have the need to explain why a cat is a cat, then you are not doing
a very good job in the first place.
The show
and not tell also applied to the characters and, in my opinion the one who
suffered it the most was Celaena, our main character. We are constantly told
what an amazing assassin she is, what a clever, kind, strong and impressive
person the assassin obviously is, but we never actually see that. As a matter
of fact, Celaena doesn’t even kill anybody and is constantly helped out by men.
It amazed me time and time again how, for telling us just how awesome Celaena
was, the author wrote things that showed the exact opposite. But I’ll get on to
that later.
The world
building in ACOTAR was beautiful, unfortunately due to how sheltered Feyre had
to be in a place where every fairy wanted to kill her, we couldn’t see much of
it. But the little details that were constructed into the plot gave us an idea
of a much larger picture. We could see that the author put a lot of thought
into the world, and it would be effortless for her to expand our knowledge of
said universe since the grounds for it were already there.
I can’t say
the same thing about Throne of Glass. In this world, magic was as ancient as
the world itself until a conqueror decided to wipe it out. Why? How? We do not
know. I was expecting to see more of this; imagine this place where magic,
fairies, trolls and every being you can imagine exists, they all have their own
cultures, languages, traditions, history (at least I hope so because it wasn’t
explained, but it would be really lame if they didn’t) and suddenly a human
comes wanting to vanish all of that.
I was
expecting to see the devastation of that war, imagine what it must have been
like to succeed in destroying something so ancient! Imagine the people having
to readjust their lives to this new world without magic! How much did humans
interact with it beforehand? And how did its disappearance affected their
lives today? But I was saved from all of that by the fact that all magical
beings never put up a fight. Apparently the King wanted magic vanished… so they
simply vanished.
How did
this happen? And, for the love of God why did it happen? It would at least make
some sense if we were to say that these beings lived peacefully through ancient
treaties or so, or that it wasn’t in their nature to be violent and so they
never put up a fight and were slaughtered with ease, but then we are shown that
these people were warriors, and mighty ones at that. There are legends about
their wars and battles, so what happened?
Lack of
thought into the storyline is what happened.
And yes, I
know that there are some novellas that are previous to Throne of Glass, and
since I haven’t read them I can’t say that the world isn’t really explained
because it might be in those prequels, but that’s not the point. A first novel
should be there to set the grounds for the story to come, you can’t just start
up out of nowhere and give no explanation on the world, the rules and mythology
as if it were fanfiction.
The story:
I wasn’t
impressed by the plot, as much as I had wanted to love it. The summary promises
us an assassin fighting for her freedom in a competition against other
criminals to become the King’s next champion. But as the competition progresses
and the champions start appearing dead, Celaena realizes that something dark is
lurking in the palace, and it will be up to her to figure out what is wrong
before she is targeted next.
Instead of
all of this, we find that the competition, the main plot of the entire book is
not really such thing but rather something that it’s dealt with in a couple of
sentences. I was looking forward to the action of these trials, but they were
merely mentioned every now and then as the narration decided to focus on the
love triangle between Celaena, the Captain of the Royal Guard Chaol Westfall,
and the crown Prince, Dorian Havillard. Besides this, not much really happened
in the first 300 pages of the book, which is to say nothing happened in 90% of
Throne of Glass, how is this possible?
The mystery
killings were what intrigued me the most here. I love a good mystery, and I was
curious as to see why the champions were being murdered; was it a plot to get a
certain champion to win? Or was it something far more mysterious? After all
they were killed in strange ways… and we saw none of that. The mystery is
barely registered up until the 80% since before that Celaena was too content
letting the guard deal with a possible treat to her life. She doesn’t care
about people being killed, or that she could be next and so the narration
doesn’t care either. It was disappointing that none of the plots mentioned in
the summary were not a part of the book.
It bored
me, it was not fun to read about nothing going on and on, back in circles of
more nothing ever happening. The logic fails also bored and annoyed me in equal
amounts.
The resolution of said mystery was lame as hell. Of course that person would be the killer! There was no surprise or suspense in the plot, and that was incredibly dissapointing.
The King
wants to find hiss next champion, a person who would be loyal to him and do his
bidding without questioning him, whether that is killing, torturing, spying or
whatever he needs… And yet he wants for the champion to be chosen from
criminals? Why? Why if he’s looking for someone who would be loyal to him, he looks
between the people who have disobeyed his laws? That’s like hiring a
self-proclaimed child murderer as a nanny!
Plus, he is
not the one who is choosing these people, his court men do it for him. The King
is hiring a person to be his thug, and it wouldn’t be beyond the realm of
possibility that some of this thug’s mission would be to kill, spy or torture
the same court member that brought him/her into the palace in the first place,
who is to say that the thug won’t turn against the King? That he/she is actually
a pawn of the person who took the champion into the palace?
Another
logic fail is that, by hosting the competition in the castle and having
everybody at court watch the trainings, they would all know who is chosen and
how he/she works. There would be no secrecy! Everybody would know who the
champion is, how that person works, his/her weaknesses and strengths. It’s dumb
and pointless.
There is
also the part of the contract. Apparently, the stipulations for this
competitions is: you lose, you get send to wherever it is you came from or you
do whatever the hell your sponsor wants you to do. If you win and become a
champion, you sign a four-year long contract, after which you are freed and
have your expensive salary to use as you please. Who the hell would do this??
You have killed for this King, you have done unspeakable things in his name and
after only four years he would let go of you? That’s just plain dumb, you could
sell his secrets to ANYBODY, who’d be better than his champion to know of all
the dirty things he has done?
It doesn’t
make sense, and I can usually overlook this things but the book itself demands
you to use logical thinking only to suspend it in the things that should be
logical, like the motherfreaking plot!
Now that
that it’s settled I’ll move on to the characters:
Before I
began reading I had seen contradictory opinions on Celaena, some hated her
while others loved it. Conflict over the main character is nothing new, of
course, but as I started to read reviews in more depth I saw a point that
struck a cord with me; people hated Celaena because she was strong, and they
would love her if she were a guy. This is something that I absolutely hate, and
that unfortunately happens a lot in our society. Women are judged unfairly, and
what’s acceptable for guys, it’s not for women. We have to be perfect, pure but
sexy, innocent and smart, strong but not too strong.
How many times
have we seen people complain about female characters but then praise male ones
that are exactly the same? There have been far too many Korras, Kataras,
Katherine Pierces and endless more female characters who have been treated this
way. It’s an unfair double-standard that most people don’t even realize they
are applying because we are too used to it. The fact that people were apparently
judging Celaena this way pissed me off, and I was more than sure that she would
be an amazing character wrongly accused for being too awesome.
And yet…
Celaena was my biggest problem and disappointment in
this novel (don’t kill me just yet) and it’s such a shame because it started
out so well! Just look at this:
“She loved
clothes—loved the feeling of silk, of velvet, of satin, of suede and
chiffon—and was fascinated by the grace of seams, the intricate perfection of
an embossed surface.”
Lately, we’ve
seen a tendency when it comes to female characters. People are getting tired
(luckily) of the typical damsel in distress with no agenda or personality, and
we are demanding more real characters, strong and capable as we are in real
life (not to say the people like that don’t exist, but they are only a part of
the population, not the entire world!). But there seems to be a
misunderstanding on how said characters should be. There is the idea that, in
order for a woman to be strong she has to think and behave like what is
accepted as “typically male”, which often leads to female character proclaiming
to be better than other girls because they dislike dresses and other stuff
considered “feminine”.
It’s
moronic. First of all, if you have to put other people down to make yourself
look good, you are not that great. Secondly, what’s wrong with being feminine?
Seriously! I have read about female characters proclaiming that wearing a dress
made them “dumber”, though they were clearly not too bright to begin with if
they were so easily affected by a piece of fabric. You can be awesome and like
dresses and make-up, you can be strong and kick ass, you can be strong and have
your ass kicked. I don’t know what it is with people and this kind of dangerous
ideas about feminism that they believe women can only be respected, scratch
that, should only be respected if
they behave in a way that pleases men, but it’s freaking insulting and dumb,
annnd annoying.
Which was
why I had been so happy to see that Celaena was not like that. She was
confident (She was the greatest freaking assassin in the entire world!) and she
loved dresses, embroideries, she enjoyed colors, pastries, and I loved it! I
honestly believed Celaena would become one of my favourite characters.
What
happened you may ask? Or you don’t and I’m just writing this review to the
empty void that it’s the internet, hello void! (Yes, I totally stole that but
I’m talking to the void, he won’t mind.)
The writing
style had a large influence on her, especially the “tell and not show”. On the
book we are constantly told how amazing Celaena is, how she is the best
Assassin in the entire world and she could kill anybody with a snap of her
fingers, but we never see this. In fact, and something that confused me to no
end was that the author kept on bringing characteristics, actions and
situations that proved Celaena was the exact opposite of a “Great Assassin”. I
simply did not get it, because this was constant, and how can you convince us
of something by telling us the exact opposite?
As an
assassin, EVERYBODY could sneak up on her. Hardly a chapter went by without
someone startling her, or watching her for minutes without her noticing. How
could this be? How hadn’t she been killed just yet? And it was aggravating
because the same narration acknowledged it!
“Dorian
peeled himself from the wall. For all her assassinating experience, she didn’t
notice him until he sat down on the bench beside her.”
“He
remained in the doorway, fearful that she’d wake up if he took another step.
Some assassin. She hadn’t even bothered to stir.”
As a matter
of fact, many people not only watch her sleep without her noticing, they also
enter her chambers on several occasions and leave bags of candy, breakfast,
prepare clothes and the bathroom, and even take out her dog without her even
noticing. And here we are talking about a woman who not only spent six years as
an assassin, but she also spent a year as a slave where she had to constantly
watch her back, aaand then she was moved to a castle were the competitors (like
herself) were being targeted and killed. But Celaena doesn’t even think it’s
important to stay alert, she doesn’t care that there could be someone out to
get her.
Her
abilities were also confusing. Celaena tells us that she could make a perfect
circle with arrows at a great distance, and yet she can’t hit a still target at
only a few feet from her.
“She aimed
for the edge of the innermost ring, which she hit with deadly precision. She
could have made an entire circle of arrows, if she’d wanted. And if she’d had
enough ammunition.”
Despite
being an expert at this, Celaena seems incapable of identifying the qualities
of a good arc and the force she should use on it. While firing she described
how much strength she had to use and how the arc moved, without realizing that
those were all things it shouldn’t do. I don’t get it, if the author researched
how firing an arrow worked then why did she write the things it should not do? Like, if you describe
a doctor you wouldn’t write her/him purposefully poisoning people.
It was this
constant telling and not showing that started to get on my nerves until it just
down right pissed me off. Why did I have to be told constantly of how perfect
Celaena was at everything when I could see that she wasn’t? I’ve said it before
and I’ll say it again, if you have to constantly keep telling the reader
something that should be obvious, then that’s because you are not making a good
job in the first place.
Sarah J.
Mass tries to give us the perfect character, Celaena is the best at everything,
but without her actually earning it. This is something particularly troublesome
for me because it presents the idea that women have to be perfect to be
praised, and perfection is impossible. It’s what I’ve said before, and Celaena
is the best at everything. She’s the best assassin in the world at the tender
age of sixteen (that was when she was imprisoned and was already known as such),
she’s breathtakingly beautiful, she is the best at anything she proposes
without effort. Every guy has a crush on her, every girl envies her. Animals,
even the most anti-social, love her. She loves books, because every reader loves
a bookworm. It’s a very dangerous idealization especially because it’s very
poorly executed. Celaena is everything, and at the same thing nothing. She
jumps from one thing to the other, her characterization as flimsy as her personality.
I wouldn’t
mind it if Celaena was the best assassin, gorgeous, flirt, bookworm, dog whisperer
and all of that if it made sense, but she’s magically all of those things
without making any effort.
The
assassin thing, for instance, I was looking forward to getting into the mind of
this girl. Why is it that she became an assassin? Was it for money? Pleasure?
Revenge? How does she feel about killing? Does she enjoy it, or simply does it
because it’s necessary? Those are all aspects that we should have seen, parts of her personality that should be obvious
to us since we are reading from her point of view and yet, none of this is ever
presented. Celaena and everybody around her throw the title of assassin to us
as if referring to her hair color, it doesn’t influence who she is or what she
thinks and that’s a MAJOR fault in the book. Characterization is extremely
important, and as the premise of the entire series being the adventures of a
freaking assassin, one would think we would get
to know said assassin.
Those were
things that annoyed me, but there were things I hated about Celaena. I
literally hated her. Trust me, I did not see it coming but I reached a point in
the book where I didn’t want to root for her and, unless she had a 180 degress
change in her personality, I would have been more than happy with her dying in
the arena.
Celaena is
incredibly misogynistic and petty. If you have read my previous reviews, you’ll
know that I hate slut-shaming and girl-on-girl hate. I hate it with a burning
passion; every time a girl judges another girl for her appearance, sexuality,
or proximity to her love interest, it makes me want to take said book,
violently throw it to the ground and jump on it as I scream DIE! DIE! DIE!
It’s that
bad, and it’s why I hated Celaena. She instantly judged and denigrated any
women who went near her love interest:
“She
spotted the Crown Prince, dancing and laughing with some blond idiot.”
That’s
awful! She doesn’t even know the girl, but because she’s dancing with Dorian
she’s clearly an idiot.
“Dorian was
dancing with a small brunette with outrageously large breasts that he took no
pains to avoid glancing at every so often.”
The horror!
That girl should be ashamed of her body!!
And as
someone with large breasts, I find that outrageously
offensive.
“Celaena
studied Kaltain’s narrow, narrow waist. Was it really that small? Or could she
barely breathe in her corset?”
So much
body shaming! What is wrong with Kaltain’s body? What’s the need to have to
shame her by suggesting that her corset must be killing her, since she couldn’t
possibly have that tiny waist? What the hell does Celaena CARE??
Then, there
was this gem:
She glared. “I hate women like that. They’re so
desperate for the attention of men that they’d willingly betray and harm
members of their own sex. And we claim men cannot think with their brains! At
least men are direct about it.”
What a
wonderful passive-aggressive insult! It’s like saying, “I’m not racist, but
black people are more violent.” (This other gem is from Fox News, in case you
are wondering.). Celaena says she hates women who betray their own sex for men…
while betraying her own sex for men.
And what
cemented my hate for her:
“After that, she’d sworn never to trust girls
again, especially girls with agendas and
power of their own. “
So, in
Order to be good in Celaena’s eyes you should not have power that comes from
confidence in yourself, or pursuits, or passions or goals. I CANNOT respect a
person who wants for others to be miserable so she can like them. Celaena has
power and agenda, but she is the only one who should have that. That’s
horrible! And especially in the age the book is settled in, women are treated
as properties. We have seen how everybody mocked her for being a girl, and yet
Celaena wants women to remain this way, powerless and weak. How can someone be
so horrible? That’s like living a comfortable life and wishing “Man, I hope there
are still people in the world starving to death.” WHAT THE FUCK??!!
Celaena
constantly feels the need to put people down so she can look better in comparison;
she tore apart other girl’s appearance, personalities or ideas so that she could
feel better about herself. If you need to tore other people down to look
better, YOU ARE NOT VERY FUCKING GOOD.
Unfortunately,
that’s not the only thing that annoyed me. Celaena is dumb. There, I said it,
she is. There is a killer targeting champions, like herself, and she doesn’t
care one bit. She doesn’t even set a guard or even locks the freaking door.
Even after she saw the marks under her bed and how they keep appearing every
day after she washes them, she never locks her door or, hell! tells the guards
that are there to protect her that someone keeps sneaking into her room.
She has a
test on poisons, and the very next day she finds a bag of candy that magically
appeared while she was sleeping. It has no card, and she has no idea who left
them there (May I remind you that she had found marks under her bed that
suggested she would be the next to be murdered) and, without thinking it, she
eats the entire bag of motherfreaking candy!
“Candy!” A large paper bag sat on a pillow, and
she found that it was filled with all sorts of confectionary goodies. There was
no note, not even a name scribbled on the bag. With a shrug and glowing eyes,
Celaena pulled out a handful of sweets. Oh, how she adored candy.”
It never
even crosses her mind that they could have been poisoned, and she eats half a
bag!
“Sick? Who can get sick from candy?”
A grown
person said that, one that has plenty of experience eating candy. And then,
guess what?????? She gets freaking sick!
Another
proof of her lack of judgement is related, again, to the poison test. They all
had had to identify and rank poisons from the deadliest to the most harmless.
Celaena has difficulties identifying one poison, Wolfbane. Then, at the very
end of the book, she is poisoned with Wolfbane because she never cared to learn
how the one poison she had failed to
identify in a public test where everybody saw her ignorance on said poison,
tasted like. Look, if you have a test and answer everything right but one
question, wouldn’t you want to learn it so that it doesn’t happen again? You
know, kind of like learning from your mistakes?
Celaena
doesn’t. She was aware that everybody at court, including the participants who
wouldn’t be above killing her to get the job, knew she was unable to recognize
Wolfbane, meaning that was a poison they could use to kill her, and she never
studies it! AND THEY FUCKING USE IT AGAINST HER!
The
freaking King says it himself!:
“If she’d been really good, she would have
noticed the poison before she drank.”
Yes! Thank
you, generic villain! She should have noticed the poison.
She’s a
hypocrite.
I have already
mentioned how Celaena treats women, but that’s not when the hypocrisy stops:
A flicker of shame sparked within her. What was
“Champion” but a dressed-up name for murderer? Could she actually stomach
working for him?
YOU ARE
FUCKING ASSASSIN FOR FUCKS SAKE!
What the
hell?? I would understand if Celaena were an assassin against her will, or who
targeted people who did wrong but she has claimed to kill innocent people
because she was paid to do it, because others wanted to advance in their
careers and wanted an “obstacle” removed. Not to mention that she fantasizes
about brutally murdering people when they even look at her in a bad way, or
they are better at something than she is, or they say a freaking joke. She’s a
petty, petty person but we are supposed to believe that she’s “Oh so great and
good at heart!”
“But you did not let the mines harden you; you
did not let it shame your soul into cruelty.”
SHE’S ALREADY CRUEL, AND PETTY, AND A JUDGEMENTAL ASSHOLE!
All of this
is part of a bigger problem, I don’t buy Celaena as an assassin. But it’s not
that I don’t buy a girl being the best assassin at the age of sixteen, it’s
just Celaena.
Look, I really
dislike the term Mary Sue. For those of you who don’t know, a Mary Sue is a
female character idealized to the point of perfection; she’ll be the best at
whatever she intends, however impossible it may seem, she’ll be the most
beautiful girl in the world that every boy craves and she might also have super
amazing and impossible powers (depending on the genre). It’s basically wish
fulfillment, a way for an author to insert him/her into the story but with
improved characteristics. The male version is called “Gary Stu” and one of the
most popular ones is Batman. My problem is that there is always a double
standard for boys and girls. As I had said, before I started reading I came
across many reviewers who claimed that people would love Celaena if she were a
guy and, although that’s not true for me I know for a fact that it’s true to
other people. I mean, Batman is the biggest wish fulfillment character out
there and nobody says it’s ridiculous, but many would if he were a she.
But still,
does that mean that Mary Sues and Gary Stus are not real? No.
And
Celaena, unfortunately is a Mary Sue. My problem with these characters, either
male or female is that they don’t earn anything. I hate people who are
magically handed everything, it’s not logical or realistic.
Celaena was
the best assassin before she was betrayed and imprisoned when she was only sixteen,
which means she had trained for less than eight years before she became known
as the greatest assassin. How could she have gotten so good when she doesn’t
even has discipline? I don’t know if it’s possible for a child to overcome her
own master and people who have trained and worked for decades, but it certainly
is impossible for someone who has no self-discipline, will to learn or care
about improving their knowledge.
Despite
having being starved and beaten for over a year, and having to compete in
fights with much older and rougher guys, Celaena doesn’t care that she is out
of shape and doesn’t care for training either. She’s convinced that, because
she was the “greatest assassin ever” she can still beat them without effort.
That’s a major flaw, especially for an assassin because she’s overestimating
herself.
This girl’s
period stopped coming, her freaking period! You know how much weight she probably
lost for that to happen? Her muscles would be atrophied because the body
started consuming them long ago in order to stay alive. Her bone density
probably diminished as well. As far as strength goes, Celaena should barely be
able to take a few walks.
If she lost,
she would be sent back to Endovier, don’t you think anybody would do anything
in her power to stop that? But Celaena doesn’t care, she claims that she can do
anything… though she is always offended when she is not helped in cheating the tests.
Not to
mention how she spent the night before a test, awake reading a book. That’s how
little she cares, but yet again why should she? She’s a Mary Sue, of course
everything will work out for her.
Something
that confused me was the title she had and how nobody really knew who Celaena
was. As an assassin, anonymity is everything, I mean if everybody knows who you
are then it’s much harder for you to get your job done, people will try to kill
you all the time. Nobody knew who Celaena Sardothien was, just her name and her
reputation... which basically means everybody knew who she was. She has met
people on the book who recognized her easily enough and no wonder there, since
she was always bragging. It was weird, because Celaena insisted on how nobody
knew who she was or how she had to keep her identity a secret, while always
trying to prove she was, in fact, Celaena.
“I hate you telling me to hold back when Brullo
sings Cain’s praises and I’m just there, boring and unnoticed in the middle.”
That’s how
it should be! For the love of God, she’s still weak and if the guys knew she
was a treat they could team up and kill her easily enough. Wouldn’t it be
better if she didn’t draw attention to herself? Smarter? It would be, but
Celaena is not smart.
The truth
is, for all her perfection, I can’t say anything positive about her. I liked
her potential in the beginning, but she soon proved me wrong. And the thing is,
flawed as she was I could have loved her! Minus the slut-shaming, I love
characters who are freaking wrong and messed up, but what killed it was that
everybody insisted on how perfect she was, on what a truly good and pure heart she
had and how she could do anything.
Celaena is
sold as a strong character, a woman who fends for herself in a male-dominated
world and yet, she has no real power. Everything she achieves is done for her
by men, the tests and fights, even her survival at the castle could not have
been accomplished if she hadn’t been helped by several guys through the journey.
She does nothing for herself, and we are meant to praise her as a feminist
icon? I’m sorry, but Celaena is one of the most un-feminist characters I have
read about, and that’s not an opinion, that’s a fact.
Dorian.
Damn, as if
disliking Celaena wasn’t bad enough, I disliked everyone’s favourite love
interest. Go big or go home, I guess.
Ok no, seriously,
what’s up with this guy? Dorian Havillard is the crown Prince, and the one who
takes Celaena out of the mines and into the castle to become his father’s next
champion. Perhaps it was because he, like Celaena not killing anybody, did
nothing a prince would do. You would think the future ruler of an empire would
study and be engaged on what happens with his kingdom, the wars it’s fighting,
its people. But no, Dorian is the typical playboy prince with daddy issues. If
he lived today he would be the spoiled child of a corporate magnate, too busy
chasing girls and thinking himself so charming, but stumping his feet and
crying every time his dad doesn’t think he’s capable of running the company.
Seriously, Dorian would complain and complain on how his father didn’t take him
seriously when he did literally nothing to be respected. I guess he just hoped
everybody would love him and respect him without him lifting a finger, poor
guy.
His
relationship with Celaena was pretty annoying, since it was basically half the
plot of the book and one I couldn’t care less about. Dorian is bored of his
life at court, and when Celaena arrives, a pretty and “sassy” girl who turns
him down, he’s excited. Let’s face it, he chases Celaena because it’s a game
for him and possibly because he had already chased the rest of the women in the
castle.
He claims
over and over that his attraction toward her is more than just that, but again
it’s too much talking and little showing. Sometime in the plot he gets all of
this profound feelings that he tries to shove down our throat, it fails to
convince me for one simple reason; there is no reason. Why does Dorian like
Celaena besides for a little fun? Well he likes her because she is… umm… ok, he
appreciates her… ehhhh…. Mmmm… beauty?
I don’t
know, there is no reason. And, yes I know that love is unpredictable and
illogical and all, but he suddenly is in love and that’s it. What does he like
about her besides the fact that she is someone fun to forget about court life?
He was a
womanizer, or the term would be fuckboy? What does fuckboy mean anyways? Every
online dictionary has a different answer... Sorry, I’m ranting. He uses women
and then has the audacity of mocking them! And, of course Celeana beamed and
laughed whenever Dorian said unflattering things about his previous lovers.
“I can't stomach the idea of
marrying a woman inferior to me in mind and spirit. It would mean the death of my soul “
It
would mean the death of my soul. It would mean the death of my soul.
What
a fucking idiot. He’s met countless of women and none of them are similar or
superior to him in mind and soul? Kaltain is smart as fuck, and she’s just one!
But pretty Celaena, the one who chocked down an entire bag of possibly poisoned
candy is, oh so superior??
Another
reason why I disliked him, HE SAYS WOMEN EXAGGERATE WHEN WE ARE ON OUR PERIOD. Look,
if that’s not a major danger sign I don’t know what it is. Just look at this:
“Celaena opened an eye and frowned as Dorian
sat on her bed. “I’m in a state of absolute agony and I can’t be bothered.” “It
can’t be that bad,”
Bite me
Dorian, honestly. There was nothing I found that I could like about him.
Chaol.
Well, what
can I say? I really like the guy for most of the book. Sure, it wasn’t an
spectacular love or anything, but considering how everything pissed me off,
finding something that didn’t was nice. Chaol Westfall is the captain of the
royal guard, Dorian’s Best friend and Celaena’s personal guard who also forms
part of the love triangle.
I actually
preferred his relationship with Celaena to her and Dorian. With the prince it
was pretty much insta-love/lust but I couldn’t get it from the assassin’s side,
why did she like Dorian? All she said was that he was handsome and that he was
not as bad as she thought he would be, but that’s it. Not to mention how we have
the mention of her previous lover, Sam who was killed before she was
imprisoned. Celaena mentions now and then how his absence still hurts her and
yet there is no conflict with her new romances. God, so little thought was put
into this, it’s mind-numbing.
At least
with Chaol the two got to know each other, though my rooting for him and their
relationship soon died when he started worshipping Celaena. Seriously, why did
they have to ignore her faults in order for her to be loved? Why couldn’t she
be an assassin with a bad temper like she was, instead of presenting us this
wonderful person of pure heart and intentions that didn’t exist?
I also
found ridiculous how he had never killed anybody. I’m sorry, but he was captain
of the royal guard, CAPTAIN! How the heck did he get that title, by being
Dorian’s friend? I’m sorry, but it was just impossible.
Nehemia was another character that was a bit of a disappointment.
I loved that she was fighting for her people, even though her immaturity and
selfishness worked against them rather than help them. Still, she had a plan,
she had character I could root for her, but she was merely an accessory to
Celaena. Their friendship, just like the romance has no grounds. Why did the
two of them liked each other? Fuck me if I know, they seemed to like to laugh
at other women and their silly ways so, I guess to add more to the girl-on-girl
shame? As if we didn’t have enough of that already.
If I’m
being honest, her entire development and inclusion in the plot made me afraid
she would turn out as a stereotype which, in one way she did... But luckily, she wasn’t killed which was my
biggest fear surrounding her character.
Overall, to
say Throne of Glass was a disappointment is an understatement. The only reason
I didn’t give it one star was because many people say that the second is
amazing, and this was Sarah J. Mass’ first book, so I want to give the series
another try instead of judging it right away. Still, so disappointing in every
way. So far, I wouldn’t recommend this at
all.
Holy crap this is a long review O_O
ReplyDeleteBut I find that I'm really liking your reviews! They're ranty and insightful. As for Throne of Glass, I agree with you on Celaeeana's character, and Dorian, and Chaol (though I still love him despite his unrealistic non killing trait and his strange affection for Celaena). I just 100% Agree with you on Celaena. She was such a walking contradiction and disappointment! I saw nothing in the story where she actually earned the title of World's Greatest Assassin. She was a judgmental idiot with her priorities aaalll out of wack.
Hahah, thanks! It's the longest review I've written so far. I just wanted to explain what I thought about the book as best as I could. Celaena was a big disapointment! I was so lucking forward to reading about a strong female character, and instead we got a girl who couldn't do anything without a man's help and no purpose. it's everything people disliked about heroines like Bella Swan, but just because she throws a few threats here and there she's "badass"? Like you said, there was nothing that showed why she was such a great assassin, it just got annoying.
Delete